TOP LATEST FIVE CASES LAWS ON SUKUK BONDS URBAN NEWS

Top latest Five cases laws on sukuk bonds Urban news

Top latest Five cases laws on sukuk bonds Urban news

Blog Article

Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights while respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. On the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided from the decision of your Supreme Court while in the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court 92. nine. The aforesaid exceptions are missing in the present case. In these circumstances, this petition is found to get not maintainable and is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more

The court emphasised that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity on the offense demands the most stringent punishment, thinking about the sanctity of human life and deterrence for possible offenders.

4.       Record shows that the petitioner continues to be booked in as much as 8 criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the instant case. Regardless that the petitioner has obtained bail in People cases, it does, prima facie, establish that the petitioner is at risk of repeating the offence.

Note: Please fill any area and Click on Search button, if you do not know the complete information please leave industry blank.

These past decisions are called "case legislation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Allow the decision stand"—would be the principle by which judges are bound to this sort of past decisions, drawing on proven judicial authority to formulate their positions.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there could possibly be just one or more judgments provided (or reported). Only the reason with the decision of the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all may very well be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning may be adopted in an argument.

The court cannot listen to the transfer order challenge since it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders holding in view that among the respondents has retired from service as pointed out through the counsel to the respondent university. 12. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order concerning costs. Read more

9.  Needless to mention that any observations made in the above mentioned order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.

If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent and the case under appeal, Probably overruling the previous case regulation by setting a new precedent of higher authority. This may possibly materialize several times because the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first on the High Court of Justice, later of the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his development from the concept of estoppel starting during the High Trees case.

Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight provided to any reported judgment could rely on the reputation of both the reporter as well as judges.[seven]

, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling around the same kind of case.

13309-B of 2010 for being weak types of evidence as well as the evidentiary value whereof would be noticed for the time of your trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Consequently, confirmed custody of your petitioner in jail is unlikely to provide any beneficial purpose at this stage.”

one hundred fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits could possibly be withheld on account of your allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section twenty in the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does give for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may be withheld or more info reduced. These incorporate if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension might be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension can be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established through the government.

Report this page